For Simple Tasks
Start with Zero-Shot or Role Prompting. Clear instructions and a persona are often all you need.
A comprehensive reference to the most effective prompt engineering techniques and frameworks. Each framework is explained with practical examples, step-by-step instructions, and a detailed FAQ — so you can choose the right approach for every AI interaction.
The most widely-used prompt engineering techniques — learn these first.
Guide the model to reason through problems step by step, dramatically improving accuracy on complex tasks.
Learn more →Explore multiple distinct reasoning paths simultaneously and evaluate each branch before committing to a solution.
Learn more →Generate multiple independent reasoning paths to the same question, then aggregate the most consistent answer.
Learn more →Give clear instructions without any examples, relying entirely on the model's pre-trained knowledge.
Learn more →Provide a handful of input-output examples so the model learns the exact pattern or format you need.
Learn more →Assign a specific role or persona to the model to unlock domain expertise and a consistent communication style.
Learn more →Break complex tasks into sequential prompts where each output feeds into the next, building sophisticated pipelines.
Learn more →Interleave reasoning traces with concrete actions — Thought → Action → Observation — to solve tasks requiring tool use.
Learn more →Role, Task, Format — the fastest role-based prompt template. Who you are, what to do, how to present it.
Learn more →Role, Action, Context, Expectation — four components that cover who acts, what to do, the background, and the desired output.
Learn more →Role, Instructions, Steps, End Goal, Narrowing — five parts covering who, what, how, outcome, and constraints.
Learn more →Capacity/Role, Insight, Statement, Personality, Experiment — six components including tone and multiple-variation generation.
Learn more →Context, Objective, Style, Tone, Audience, Response — six components popular for system prompt and content design.
Learn more →Attention, Interest, Desire, Action — the classic 1898 direct-response formula adapted for AI-generated marketing copy.
Learn more →Problem, Agitate, Solution — identify the pain, amplify it emotionally, then present the answer.
Learn more →Deeper and domain-specific frameworks — reach for these when you need more precision or control.
Systematically draft, test, evaluate, and revise prompts in iterative cycles until output quality meets your standard.
Learn more →LLMs generate verbal self-reflection on their own failures and use the linguistic feedback to improve subsequent attempts.
Learn more →Multiple AI instances debate opposing positions over several rounds; a judge synthesizes the most accurate final answer.
Learn more →Applies evolutionary algorithms — crossover, mutation, selection — to automatically optimize prompts across generations.
Learn more →Cognitive-science-inspired prompting that structures inputs to activate specific reasoning modes and reduce cognitive load.
Learn more →The simplest 3-part structure — Task, Action, Goal — for fast, goal-oriented prompts.
Learn more →Action, Purpose, Expectation — a minimal 3-part framework that always asks why the task matters.
Learn more →Role, Input, Steps, Expectation — a concise 4-part structure with an explicit Input component for data-driven tasks.
Learn more →Context, Action, Result, Example — anchors every prompt with a concrete example to eliminate ambiguity.
Learn more →Intent, Details, Examples, Adjustments — includes an Adjustments component for iterative, feedback-driven refinement.
Learn more →Goal, Reality, Options, Will — the classic coaching model adapted for structured problem-solving prompts.
Learn more →Position, Reason, Evidence, Position — a concise argumentation formula for persuasive writing prompts.
Learn more →Situation, Task, Action, Result — adapted from interview methodology for narrative and case-study prompts.
Learn more →Inform, Explain, Example, Input — a teaching-focused structure that builds context before processing your content.
Learn more →Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound — classic project management criteria applied to prompt design.
Learn more →Clarity, Relevance, Intent, Specificity, Precision — a quality-evaluation checklist for diagnosing and improving any prompt.
Learn more →Structure prompts with Objective, Role, Context, and Action for clear, targeted AI responses.
Learn more →Task, Request, Action, Context, Example — extends TAG with context and an example for richer, more precise prompts.
Learn more →Before, After, Bridge — contrasts the current problem with the desired state and shows how to get there.
Learn more →Context, Objective, Actions, Scenario, Task — adds a Scenario component for situationally grounded, realistic prompts.
Learn more →Role, Aim, Input, Numeric Target — forces quantifiable, measurable outputs with an explicit Numeric Target component.
Learn more →Function, Level, Output, Win Metric — performance-oriented framework that defines how success will be judged.
Learn more →Problem, Insights, Voice, Outcome — problem-first framework that weaves brand voice into the prompt structure.
Learn more →Situation, End Goal, Examples, Deliverables — plants full context for deliverable-focused project prompts.
Learn more →Direction, Existing Info, Expertise, Preferred Tone — emphasizes tone specification for brand-sensitive content.
Learn more →Context, Logic, Expectations, Action, Restrictions — adds Logic and Restrictions for precision and compliance tasks.
Learn more →Question, Understanding, Expectation, Scope, Time — adds Scope and Time constraints for bounded research prompts.
Learn more →Goal, Understanding, Information, Direction, Evaluation — defines success criteria explicitly for advisory tasks.
Learn more →Function, Outcome, Criteria, Underlying Assumptions, Strategy — makes hidden assumptions explicit for strategic prompts.
Learn more →Role, Action, Steps, Constraints, Examples — comprehensive 5-part framework combining persona, process, guardrails, and examples.
Learn more →Objective, Scope, Constraints, Assumptions, Results — project-management-inspired framework making scope and assumptions explicit.
Learn more →Purpose, Expectation, Context, Request, Audience — audience-aware 5-part structure for targeted communication prompts.
Learn more →Research, Hypothesis, Objectives, Development, Execution, Synthesis — a rigorous 6-component academic research methodology.
Learn more →Conceptualize, Research, Experiment, Analyze, Transform, Evaluate — a six-stage creative process for structured innovation.
Learn more →Seven creative lenses — Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put to Another Use, Eliminate, Rearrange — for systematic idea generation.
Learn more →Structures prompts to generate content optimized for search engine result pages and AI-generated search overviews.
Learn more →Start with Zero-Shot or Role Prompting. Clear instructions and a persona are often all you need.
Use Chain-of-Thought or Self-Consistency to force step-by-step reasoning and increase accuracy.
Use Few-Shot Prompting to show the model exactly what output structure you expect.
Use RISEN or CRISPE frameworks for structured, comprehensive prompts that leave nothing ambiguous.
Use Prompt Chaining to break large tasks into manageable, sequential steps with clear hand-offs.
Use ReAct or Tree of Thoughts when the model needs to reason, act, and adapt based on new information.
A prompt is a specific instruction given to an AI. A framework is a reusable, structural template that organizes how you write that instruction to guarantee consistent, high-quality outputs. A prompt solves one task once; a framework gives you a repeatable structure you can apply to any task of the same type.
Advanced reasoning frameworks like Tree of Thoughts and Multi-Agent Debate consume the most tokens because they require multiple API calls, branching logic, and self-evaluation passes. Self-Consistency also runs the same prompt several times to aggregate answers. Simple structural frameworks like RACE, RTF, and Zero-Shot have minimal token overhead.
Yes. You can easily combine structural frameworks with reasoning techniques. For example, use RISEN to structure your persona and task, while instructing the model to use Chain-of-Thought for its actual reasoning. See the Prompt Flows section for curated multi-framework sequences designed for specific real-world outcomes.
Most structural frameworks (like RACE or CRISPE) are model-agnostic and work reliably across Claude, GPT-4, and Gemini. However, advanced reasoning techniques like Tree of Thoughts and Multi-Agent Debate require highly capable models to function effectively — weaker models tend to collapse the branching logic or produce inconsistent self-evaluations.
Prompt Edit is a free macOS app that lets you save any of these prompt styles as reusable templates with dynamic variables. Write once, use everywhere — completely offline and private.
Download Prompt Edit — Free